CASE COMMENTARY – BRIJ BHUSAN SHARMA VERSUS THE STATE OF DELHI

CASE COMMENTARY – BRIJ BHUSAN SHARMA VERSUS THE STATE OF DELHI

CASE COMMENTARY – BRIJ BHUSAN SHARMA VERSUS THE STATE OF DELHI

Author – SUJITHA S, Student at Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology

Best Citation – SUJITHA S, CASE COMMENTARY – BRIJ BHUSAN SHARMA VERSUS THE STATE OF DELHI, SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT REPORTER, 1 (1) of 2023, Pg. 58-60, ISBN – 978-81-960677-8-6.

ABSTRACT

Media is the foremost pillar of vibrant democracy. The right exerted by the media is to convey things to the public without any intervention or pressure from any side. Indian constitution holds the provision for the freedom of speech and expression which cannot be suppressed by others to behold the political freedom to be exerted by the media. Supreme Court states down about the freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1) of Indian Constitution.

KEYWORDS: Constitution, Media, Freedom, Court, Democracy